CONCENTRIX · ESG REPORT
Recycling & Circular-Impact 2021–2026 · DRAFT
📅 live data ← Dashboard
Couldn't reach the PASUYO institution API — figures below fall back to the cited research values in docs/esg & docs/CONCENTRIX_REAL_RECOVERY.md.
♻️ Trash-to-Cashback · Institution ESG layer

Concentrix Eco-Warriors
Recycling & Circular-Impact Report

2021 – 2026 · 18 NCR sites
DRAFT · external assurance sign-off pending
⚠️ Internal use only — not for external reporting without written permission (BEST · bXTRA PH · Concentrix) + accuracy sign-off.

A board-ready disclosure of measured waste diverted from disposal across Concentrix's Philippine sites, with a strictly-separated carbon view. Built to under-claim: we report the hard diverted mass first, an inventory line second, and any avoided-emissions figure as a clearly-labelled estimate — never as a tradable credit.

~149 t
recovered & recycled · measured (GRI 306-4)
18
Concentrix NCR sites · 8 cities
361,963
Environmental Points issued

Powered by PASUYO for Business of bXTRA PH · More redemption outlets → bxtra.ph
Data of record: BEST Trash-to-Cashback ledger (measured deposits, 2021–2026).
Frameworks: GRI 306-4 (Waste 2020) · GHG Protocol Scope 3 Cat. 5 · EPA WARM v15/16 · EPA GHG Emission Factors Hub 2024 · UK DEFRA 2024 (v1.1) · PH SEC MC4 s.2019 / MC16 s.2025 (PFRS S1–S2).
Reporting period 2021–Jun 2026. 2022 export = January-only (partial — not annualized). Status: DRAFT pending limited assurance.

1. Executive summary

The headline is a measured mass, not a model. Across 18 Concentrix NCR sites over 2021–2026, the BEST Trash-to-Cashback ledger records ~149 tonnes of office paper, corrugated carton, metal and PET diverted from disposal through recycling — a directly-measured figure (GRI 306-4), not an estimate.

SOURCE-SEGREGATED CONTAMINATION-FREE RECYCLING-READY

The number is credible because of how it is captured. Materials are segregated at the source by eco-warriors — clean, dry, sorted by type before they ever mix with general waste. They skip the 16–50% contamination loss typical of commingled recycling (UF / FL DEP MRF Contamination Report 2020; NWRA via FiveThirtyEight 2019), so they arrive recycling-ready and are genuinely remanufactured into new products. We therefore count avoided emissions only on verified-recycled tonnage. Segregation-at-source is also Philippine law (RA 9003, Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000, §21), so the program is compliance-aligned by construction.

Integrity posture — we under-claim. This report keeps three carbon numbers strictly separate and never sums them: ① the diverted mass (measured), ② a small recycling-process emissions line that belongs in the inventory (≈13 t CO₂e), and ③ a separately-reported avoided-emissions estimate shown as a range with its conservative floor first. The avoided figure is an estimate, not a tradable, owned or sellable carbon credit, and is never deducted from any Scope total.
What the program demonstratesFigureBasis
Waste diverted from disposal (recycling, offsite, non-haz)~149 tGRI 306-4 · measured · BEST ledger
Sites engaged across Metro Manila & Laguna18BEST per-branch attribution
Environmental Points issued to warriors361,963BEST ledger (measured)
Recycling-process emissions (inventory line)≈ 13 t CO₂eGHG Scope 3 Cat. 5 · EPA Hub 2024 Table 9
Estimated avoided emissions (reported separately)≈ 68 – 455 t CO₂eEPA WARM v15/16 (A) · DEFRA 2024 floor (B) — estimate, not a credit

All measured figures lineage to the BEST Trash-to-Cashback ledger (per-deposit weights stamped to the org tree at verification). Modeled figures (CO₂e) are derived at read-time from measured material grams × cited factors. Measured ≠ modeled — treated differently throughout.

2. GRI 306-4 — Waste diverted from disposal

GRI 306-4 reports the mass of waste kept out of disposal, broken down by composition, recovery operation, and onsite/offsite. For Concentrix all recovery is non-hazardous · Recycling · offsite (third-party). Units are metric tonnes (t) (GRI 306: Waste 2020, clause 2.2 — 1,000 kg = 1 t).

Basis: GRI 306-4 · measured · BEST Trash-to-Cashback ledger · 2021–2026 · 18 NCR sites · non-hazardous, Recycling, offsite. Preparation-for-reuse and other-recovery = 0 (not tracked).

2.1 By material composition (GRI 306-4-a / -c-ii)

Material (composition)Diverted (t)ShareRecovery operation
Office / mixed paper & corrugated carton129.686.9%Recycling · offsite
PET plastics13.99.3%Recycling · offsite
Metal (tin / steel)5.73.8%Recycling · offsite
Glass0.03<0.1%Recycling · offsite
TOTAL recycled (non-haz, offsite)149.2100%Recycling · offsite

Contextual (306-4-e): direct measurements from the BEST T-t-C ledger (per-deposit weights by designated site-coordinator card). Onsite recovery = none. Hazardous diverted = none (treated as non-hazardous office streams). The ledger lumps office paper + carton into one fiber stream; a documented blended factor is used where carton must be split (see Methodology).

2.2 By site (GRI 306-4-d — offsite recovery, top sites)

Concentrix siteCityDiverted (t)
Glorietta 5Makati15.6
Tera TowerBridgetowne15.0
Ayala NorthMakati13.9
SLC MakatiMakati11.5
Exxa TowerBridgetowne10.9

Full per-site breakdown across all 18 sites is available in the live dashboard. Smaller sites (North EDSA, Cubao, MOA) round to <3.5 t each.

2.3 Year-on-year (GRI 306-4 trend — supports a stated diversion target)

YearPeriodDiverted (t)EP issued
2021Mar–Dec16.555,855
2022 ⚠️Jan only3.613,410
2023full year35.592,600
2024full year41.891,888
2025full year35.573,676
2026Jan–Jun16.534,724

⚠️ 2022 is a January-only export — a partial pull / program gap. Do not annualize it; real full-year 2022 recovery is higher. This is disclosed, not smoothed.

3. Carbon — three numbers, never netted

The carbon view renders three distinct figures. The separation is the integrity firewall: they answer different questions and are never summed or netted together (GHG Protocol Scope 3 Technical Guidance, Ch. 5; GRI 306-4).

① Waste diverted · MEASURED
~149 t
A mass kept out of disposal — the hard headline. Non-hazardous · Recycling · offsite.
Basis: GRI 306-4 · measured · BEST ledger 2021–2026 (18 sites; 2022 = Jan-only).
② Process emissions · INVENTORY (+)
≈ 13 t CO₂e
A small positive figure — the only carbon number that belongs inside an emissions inventory.
Basis: GHG Protocol Scope 3 Cat. 5 (formula 5.2) · EPA GHG Emission Factors Hub 2024, Table 9 "Recycled" column · excludes avoided emissions · t→short-ton converted (÷0.90718).
③ ⚠️ Estimated AVOIDED emissions · reported SEPARATELY
≈ 68 – 455 t CO₂e
Conservative floor ≈ 68 t (boundary B, DEFRA mfg-only) shown next to the ~455 t headline (boundary A, EPA WARM). Never shown as "455 t" alone.
ESTIMATE — not a tradable / owned / sellable carbon credit
Basis: EPA WARM v15/16, boundary A (recycling vs virgin production, incl. forest carbon); conservative floor = DEFRA 2024 (v1.1) Material-use diff, boundary B (manufacturing-only). US factors applied to PH waste → directional only, not a precise PH value. Reported separately — never deducted from any Scope 1/2/3 total.
⚠️ Forest-carbon footnote (mandatory): ~97% of the paper/carton avoided-CO₂e under boundary A is modeled avoided forest-carbon sequestration, not avoided mill emissions (EPA WARM v15 Exhibit 3-17 component columns). This is the single most important under-claim — which is why the ~68 t manufacturing-only floor is shown alongside the headline.

Illustrative equivalencies

Translated from the boundary-A estimate via the EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator (Calculations & References). Illustrative only — they carry the same estimate-not-credit caveat as ③, and scale with whichever end of the 68–455 t range is used.

~99passenger cars off the road for a year (≈4.6 t CO₂e/car/yr)
~7,500tree-seedlings grown for 10 years (≈0.06 t CO₂e/seedling)
Why three numbers. ① answers "how much did we keep out of disposal?" (a mass). ② answers "what did treating that waste emit?" (small positive, inside the inventory). ③ answers "what did recycling-vs-virgin avoid?" (large, reported separately, never subtracted from a Scope total). Mixing them is the #1 way ESG numbers become wrong — so this report keeps them apart on purpose.
Carbon-credit readiness (gated, watch-only). ~149 t over five years is below standalone-project materiality, and an office program is almost certainly non-additional (RA 9003 already mandates segregation). This is an ESG avoided-emissions story + readiness pathway — keep the auditable ledger; revisit only as an aggregated multi-institution program — not a creditable project today.

4. Source-segregation integrity statement

This is why the number is defensible, not greenwashing. The avoided-emissions claim is honest only for material that is genuinely remanufactured — and source separation is exactly what makes that true.

♻ Source-segregated by eco-warrior 🧼 Clean capture uncontaminated 📦 Recycling-ready high real yield 🔄 Remanufactured product closed loop

What each clean, source-separated stream becomes (the closed loop)

Material (our stream)What it becomesLoop reality
Carton / office & white paper ~129.6 tNew containerboard & paperboardClosed-loop, high yield
PET bottles ~13.9 tNew PET bottles / polyester fiberClosed-loop when clean
Metal — tin / steel ~5.7 tNew metal cans & productsClosed-loop, recyclable indefinitely
Glass — clear bottles traceNew glass containers (if color-sorted)Closed-loop only when source-separated

Sources: EPA Source Separation & Sustainable Materials Management hierarchy; Ellen MacArthur Foundation Circular Economy; AF&PA / Fibre Box Assoc. (fiber recovery); APR / ACS Sust. Chem. & Eng. 2018 (PET); Aluminum Assoc. (metals); Container Recycling Institute (glass). Full citations in the appendix.

5. Framework crosswalk

How this program maps to the recognized disclosure frameworks. The honest placement: it is a strong GRI 306-4 waste-diversion disclosure and an employee-engagement "S" story — not a core SASB metric for a BPO.

FrameworkWhere this program landsWhat it supplies
GRI 306-4 (Waste 2020)Waste diverted from disposal — recycling, offsite, non-hazThe hard headline: tonnes by material / site / year (this report §2)
GHG Protocol Scope 3, Cat. 5Waste generated in operations (third-party recycling)Small positive inventory line (≈13 t); avoided reported separately, never netted
PH SEC MC4 s.2019Sustainability Report, Annex A — Materials / Waste / EmissionsComply-or-explain template most PH institution clients are bound by
PH SEC MC16 s.2025 (PFRS S1 / S2)Entity-specific material topic (S1) + climate metrics (S2)ISSB-aligned, phased FY2026+; recycling as an entity-specific E disclosure
CDPWaste / circular-economy & plastics module (Scope 3)Measured diversion + PET volumes; avoided CO₂e flagged as estimate (not inflating verified Scope 1/2)
SASB Professional & Commercial ServicesNot a core metric — BPO material issues are data security & human capitalBest framed as employee-engagement evidence (the "S") via IFRS/PFRS S1, not forced into an environmental SASB slot
Filing-entity strategy — attach to existing targets. Concentrix's parent is NASDAQ-listed (CNXC), not a PH PLC, so PH SEC PLC rules bind the PH entity only by threshold. The highest-credibility move is to position this tonnage as PH-site evidence under Concentrix's existing public commitments — −27% emissions vs 2019, the 2030 −50% goal, and "One Earth, One Concentrix" — rather than asserting a new claim or a specific filing obligation. Substantiate an existing target; confirm the filing entity per client.

Sources: GRI 306: Waste 2020; GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard + Tech Guidance Ch.5; SEC MC No. 4 s.2019 & MC No. 16 s.2025 (PFRS S1/S2); CDP integrated questionnaire 2024; SASB Professional & Commercial Services Standard; Concentrix 2024 ESG / 2025 Sustainability Report. Full URLs in the appendix.

6. Known limitations & gaps

Disclosed, not hidden. Under-claiming is the posture — these are the boundaries of what the data supports.

ItemLimitationHow we handle it
GRI 306-3 (total waste generated)Total waste & full composition are not instrumented — the ledger only sees the diverted-to-recycling sideDisclosed as a gap; not estimated. Diversion rate not asserted.
GRI 306-5 (waste directed to disposal)Waste-to-landfill / incineration is not instrumented (needs facility waste-bin data)Disclosed as a gap; not guessed.
2022 periodExport covers January only — a partial pull / program gapShown as Jan-only; not annualized. Real full-year 2022 is higher.
Emission factorsEPA WARM / Hub factors are US grid & US recycling infrastructure; PH conditions differAvoided figure labelled directional only; IPCC 2006 Vol.5 preferred for a PH inventory line.
Avoided emissions ③A modeled WARM estimate vs a virgin/landfill baseline — assumption-laden; ~97% forest-carbon at boundary AShown as a range with the floor first; never a credit; never netted into a Scope total.
Paper / carton splitLedger lumps office paper + corrugated carton into one fiber streamA documented blended factor (~3.3) is used until the BEST material-type field is parsed.
AssuranceThis is a DRAFTExternal limited assurance is pending before any filing-grade use.
Net effect on credibility: every gap above shrinks the claim or flags an estimate — none inflates the headline. The measured diverted mass (§2) stands on its own and is the figure to rely on.

7. Methodology & sources appendix

7.1 Data lineage

Source of record = the BEST "Trash to Cashback" ledger (Company Reports CO_CONCENTRIX_2021…2026). Per-deposit weights by material are stamped to the org tree (Institution → City → Building → Department → Employee) at verification time — the same append-only ledger that issues Environmental Points. The institution layer never creates EP; it only attributes a real, already-verified recovery. Live figures in this report are pulled from the hosted PASUYO institution API (/institutions/inst_concentrix/rollup & /leaderboard); modeled CO₂e is derived at read-time from measured material grams × the factors below.

7.2 Emission factors (with version + year)

UseMaterialFactorSource · version · year
Inventory line ②
MT CO₂e / short ton
Mixed paper (offices)0.03EPA GHG Emission Factors Hub, Feb 2024, Table 9 "Recycled" column (excludes avoided). Underlying: EPA WARM Dec 2023.
Corrugated carton0.11
Mixed metals / steel0.23 / 0.32
PET / glass0.23 / 0.05
Avoided estimate ③ · boundary A
kg CO₂e / kg recycled
Office / mixed paper3.15EPA WARM v15 (Nov 2020), values unchanged through v16 (Dec 2023) for our materials — Exhibits 3-17 (paper), 2-17 (metals), 5-11 (plastics), 1-14 (glass). Negative WARM sign = net reduction; stored as positive avoided.
Corrugated carton3.46
PET1.15
Steel / tin2.02
Glass · aluminum0.31 · 10.06
Avoided floor ③ · boundary B
kg CO₂e / kg
Paper/board (mfg-only)~0.10–0.30UK DEFRA/DESNZ GHG Conversion Factors 2024 (v1.1, Oct 2024), "Material use" sheet — primary minus closed-loop-source. Excludes forest carbon → the conservative floor.

Conversion: kg CO₂e/kg = |MT CO₂e/short ton| × 1.10231 (1 short ton = 907.18 kg). The ~455 t boundary-A figure ÷ the conservative ~68 t boundary-B floor differ almost entirely by modeled forest-carbon sequestration (~97% of the paper/carton high end). Equivalencies via EPA GHG Equivalencies Calculator.

7.3 Frameworks cited

Full live URLs are maintained in docs/esg/FRAMEWORKS_GHG_GRI.md, EMISSION_FACTORS.md, FRAMEWORKS_PH_CDP_SASB.md, SOURCE_SEGREGATED_ADVANTAGE.md, and docs/CONCENTRIX_REAL_RECOVERY.md (all fetched 2026-06-29).

Status: DRAFT — external limited assurance pending. Money, carbon-credit claims, and client comms remain human-gated. Every figure is source-cited (framework / factor + version + year); the three carbon numbers are never summed or netted; the avoided estimate always shows its floor first and the not-a-credit label; known gaps are disclosed.